Search found 30 matches

by dlflannery
Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:56 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Create vprj from existing markers?
Replies: 3
Views: 6001

Re: Create vprj from existing markers?

erik,
Does the comskip run benefit in any way (e.g., run faster) because the file already contains markers placed by PlayOn?
by dlflannery
Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:20 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Erik, Would it be possible to escape the '&' char(s) to '&' in the <Filename> element of the .vprj file output for VideoReDo type 3 outputs, as originally requested by Jagad in a post dated Nov 1, 2014 in this thread? The unescaped '&' makes the .vprj file unacceptable to the latest ver...
by dlflannery
Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:17 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Erik, Would it be possible to escape the '&' char(s) to '&' in the <Filename> element of the .vprj file output for VideoReDo type 3 outputs, as originally requested by Jagad in a post dated Nov 1, 2014 in this thread? The unescaped '&' makes the .vprj file unacceptable to the latest vers...
by dlflannery
Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:13 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

0.81.066 works fine for my purposes. Thanks Erik!
by dlflannery
Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:38 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

I added the scene list to the videoredo3 output format in build 0.81.065 Can you test? First, the --videoredo3 CL option still is not working, in fact is rejected as an invalid option by 065. Putting OutputVideoReDo3=1 in the .ini file was the only way to get Type3 .vprj file output. I found the sa...
by dlflannery
Thu Oct 09, 2014 4:45 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Erik,

Any progress on addressing the --videoredo3 issues in this thread?

CL option doesn't work as intended.
Type 3 project files have no scene markers.

Don't mean to be pushy but it's been two months since these issues were reported.
by dlflannery
Sat Sep 13, 2014 5:29 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Additional info on VideoReDo-compatible project files: 1. For both type 3 (TVS4) and type 5 (TVS5) files, scene marker elements must have a TimeCode attribute, e.g.: <SceneList><SceneMarker Sequence="1" Timecode="00:00:56;00">560560112</SceneMarker> </SceneList> Currently comskip...
by dlflannery
Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:02 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Actually it would be easier for me not to change the numbering. I can change the VAP program easily enough but there will be some users who choose to use older Comskip versions, resulting in support issues for me.
by dlflannery
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:51 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

Is the v3 output wrong? or are the scene markers missing? Can you send me some annotated examples of the v5 format? Following are three .vprj examples resulting from running Comskip and VideoReDo V5 Adscan on the same 4 minute .mp4 file: First the VRD V5 AdScan output: <?xml version="1.0"...
by dlflannery
Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:46 am
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

erik,

Just a reminder: per my earlier post here the --videoredo3 command line option is not working in 064 -- it does not force the output of type 3 .vprj files.
by dlflannery
Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:47 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

My testing with 81_064 donators indicates only the videoredo3 parameter in the .ini file controls the .vprj output type, i.e., the --videoredo3 command line option has no effect. I've also tried it with the videoredo and videoredo3 lines completely removed from the ini file. Only when output_videore...
by dlflannery
Sun Jul 27, 2014 10:34 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

No, as both files have the same filename extension I can not write both. Its either one or the other. For the moment there is actually no reason to write version 3 files as the new videoredo can read version 2 files. Hi erik. VideoReDo is testing a major new version, V5 Beta. It will not accept the...
by dlflannery
Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:02 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: File size of free vs. Early Access executables
Replies: 2
Views: 3635

File size of free vs. Early Access executables

I distribute a free version of ComSkip (comskip.exe, not the GUI version) with my program VideoReDoAutoProcessor (VAP, http://www.videoredo.net/msgBoard/showthread.php?16340-VideoReDo-Autoprocessor-Program ). I instruct users that have the Early Access version to substitute that comskip.exe and .ini...
by dlflannery
Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:02 am
Forum: Support
Topic: New VideoReDo format
Replies: 81
Views: 79169

Re: New VideoReDo format

The problem is the version of VRD. Update to the latest beta, build 637g:

http://www.videoredo.net/msgBoard/showt ... hp?t=24328