Page 1 of 1

Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:52 am
by sheppy99
I've discovered that I get different results using the Frame Array file compared to scanning the file directly with no changes to comskip.ini What are the differences between the 2 modes apart from speed? As I'm using a pre found logo the full file scan uses 2 threads and the file is SD H264 / AAC-HE

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:00 am
by erik
There is a small difference that could trigger an on-the-edge condition.
can you make the recording available to me?

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:04 am
by sheppy99
Sure, I'll upload it in a couple of hours or so, assuming you will get chance to take a look later today? Otherwise is in about 12 hours ok?

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 9:22 am
by erik
Ping me when done

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:19 am
by sheppy99
erik wrote:Ping me when done
I just sent you a PM with the links in.
Its the break between frames 57264 & 59745 that is missing when scanned with the full file. The actual end of the commercial is at 59890 but as there isn't any black frames I haven't found a way to trigger it at that frame.

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:15 pm
by erik
Very helpfull recording. Need to find the root cause of the differences.

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:48 pm
by sheppy99
Glad you can reproduce it.
Whilst I was waiting for the upload to finish I tested dropping it down to 1 thread in case that was the cause but it made no difference.

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 4:28 pm
by erik
The decoder can not do real mutithreading on certain h.264 recordings.

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:47 pm
by erik
Differences between original processing and frame array based processing should be solved in next release.

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 7:10 pm
by sheppy99
Thanks!

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:44 am
by erik
Release done, can you test. I also added some error messages for wrong string parameters and cutscenefiles not found

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:50 am
by sheppy99
I'll give it a test tomorrow, I worked around it by adding 2 secs to shrink logo. Fortunately using a pre found logo gave me 2 threads for the full single pass scan, so I tested everything with a normal scan

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:39 am
by sheppy99
erik wrote:Release done, can you test. I also added some error messages for wrong string parameters and cutscenefiles not found
I've tested it on the file that I uploaded to you, and the next in the series and it has fixed the problem, the results of both a full scan and a csv scan differ by no more than 4 frames on some of the cuts, and none on others.
On my problem channel I still get differing results, this channel has very sloppy editing, with sometimes late logos, intermittent similar to normal logos during ads, no blackframes, no guaranteed silence, and similar uniformity between show and adverts. Fortunately we don't watch a lot of that, and the fast forward button works regardless of what they do! :lol:
If I find something that's has a reproducible significant difference between FrameArray and Full Snan, I'll upload a copy.
For now I'd call it a great improvement, and for most people its likely totally fixed.
Haven't tested the cutframes yet as other methods are working.
I'll deploy the latest release now to the recorder, thanks for the prompt fix

Re: Extra Adverts found using Frame Array

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:06 pm
by erik
There is indeed a small difference in logo processing I still need to solve.